Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Victor Clayton v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 21-1789
Petitioner: VICTOR CLAYTON
Respondent: WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 21-1010
Respondent: WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Petitioner: ROCMON L. SANDERS
French v. FDC Philadelphia
as 1:2020cv01592
Defendant: FDC Philadelphia
Plaintiff: Crystal Lynn French
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2020cv05003
Respondent: WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner: DENNIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01769
Petitioner: JERMAINE COLEMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, FDC-PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 20-1359
Respondent: WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Petitioner: ROCMON L. SANDERS
Robert Reed v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 19-2926
Defendant / Appellee: CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT ANDREW REED
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant: MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff: TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Tashaun Sutton v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 19-2226
Plaintiff / Appellant: TASHAUN SUTTON, AKA Anthony Lynch
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee: MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROCMON L. SANDERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?