Cases 11 - 20 of 34
French v. FDC Philadelphia
as 1:2020cv01592
Defendant:
FDC Philadelphia
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lynn French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2020cv05003
Respondent:
WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
DENNIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv01769
Petitioner:
JERMAINE COLEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, FDC-PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant:
MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTON v. WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv03352
Petitioner:
TASHAUN SUTTON
Respondent:
WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOBLE v. WARDEN OF FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv01602
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Heffley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv10033
Plaintiff:
Travis Heffley
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Psychology Department - USP Marion, Psychology Department - FTC Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. WARDEN OF FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2016cv03090
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CREDICO v. RUFE et al
as 2:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
CYNTHIA RUFE, JOSEPH LABAR, JOSHUA HUBIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Credico, et al v. Philadelphia FDC Trust Fund Of, et al
as 15-3106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIGUEL DIAZ, (CLAIM #2)
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA FDC TRUST FUND OFFICER, (CLAIM #1), DAY, MS. (OFFICIAL CAPACITY) - (CLAIM #1), WEST GOSHEN POLICE, ET AL. (CLAIM #1) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
