Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Giffen v. FBI et al
as 3:2018cv02225
Defendant:
Kimberly Seymour, US Marshalls, Todd Bofferding and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Giffen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giffen v. FBI et al
as 3:2018cv02215
Respondent:
Kimberly Seymour, Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, Todd Bofferding and others
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singh et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2018cv01912
Defendant:
Field Office Dir. Richard L Miller, Richard Ives, Ronald D Vitiello and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh and Pachattar Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01805
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Goldman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2017cv01763
Defendant:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Does 1-10, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Jay Goldman
Seattle:
Regional Re-Entry Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Felix-Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2017cv01116
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Jorge Felix-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00915
Defendant:
Mr. Antonson, Mrs. Besse, Mr. Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
George A. Beltran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00806
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
