Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Howell v. Brookline Bancorp Building Staff and Presidents, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Howell v. Cambridge Public Library, et al
as 24-1139
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Thomas O'Neil Branch, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Howell v. Cambridge Public Library et al
as 1:2023cv13136
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Cambridge Public Library, Cambridge Police Department, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Howell v. Brookline Bancorp Building Staff and Presidents et al
as 1:2023cv13144
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Brookline Bancorp Building Staff and Presidents, Department of Justice, Federal Communications Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
In Re: Koplow
as 20-1013
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Ma. Dept. of Telecomm & Cable v. FCC
as 19-2282
Petitioner:
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2002
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2182
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2181
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
