Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Tanika Parker, et al v. Tenneco, Inc., et al
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TANIKA PARKER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated and ANDREW FARRIER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
TENNECO, INC., DRIV AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-30, John and Jane Doe Defendants
Parker et al v. Tenneco Inc et al
as 2:2023cv10816
Plaintiff:
Tanika Parker and Andrew Farrier
Defendant:
Tenneco Inc., Driv Automotive Inc, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Welch v. Federal Mogul Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Brian Welch
Defendant:
Federal Mogul Corporation , Federal Mogul Powertrain, LLC and Terry Offerle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Snyder v. Federal-Mogul Corporation
as 5:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Franklin D. Snyder
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Winkler v. Federal-Mogul Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00745
Plaintiff:
John J. Winkler
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Corporation and Roddy Millard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- ERISA
Willet v. Federal Mogul Corporation
as 2:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Diana F. Willet and Diana F. Willet
Defendant:
Federal Mogul Corporation and Federal Mogul Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
