Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Crago #115357 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Derric Keaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crago #115357 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crago #115357 v. Pitz
as 2:2019cv04532
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Pitz, Berry Larson and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felton v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2019cv01682
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Taylor Felton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00492
Plaintiff:
Felton L Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2014cv01211
Plaintiff:
Georgina M Moore and Alvin C Smith
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank , James Dimon , Tiffany & Bosco PA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crago v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02007
Petitioner:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crago v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00176
Petitioner:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crago v. Clark et al
as 2:2011cv02368
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Clark and Unknown Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
