Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01011
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Heather D Smith and FFPM Carmel Holdings I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Agnew et al
as 1:2011cv01494
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant: Donald C Agnew, Linda D Agnew, Chicago Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cottrell v. FFPM Carmel Holdings I, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv02893
Plaintiff: Amy Cottrell
Defendant: FFPM Carmel Holdings I, LLC and Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STATE OF INDIANA v. STROH et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Defendant: ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., DAVIESS COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
STATE OF INDIANA v. STROH et al
as 1:2010cv00570
Defendant: ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., DAVIESS COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00611
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Day v. Credit Bureau of Napa County, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv07020
Plaintiff: Edward Day and Edward Day
Defendant: Credit Bureau of Napa County, Inc. and FFPM Carmel Holdings I, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06100
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?