Cases 1 - 10 of 73
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. et al v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. and Terence J. Sweeney
Defendant:
Richard Neville, Walker H. Bramlett, Pamela D. Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Chambers et al
as 1:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Regenia Anderson
Defendant:
Khia Finch Chambers, Thug Misses Entertainment, Inc., Kid Distro Holdings, LLC doing business as Distrokid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
PRICE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
DELLWAYNE PRICE
Defendant:
SERGEANT WHITE, J WILLIAMS, C WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten et al v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Daron Tuten and Jamie Finch
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Casper v. Jackson et al
as 2:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Ellis Casper
Defendant:
Carl Jackson, Stephen Walkowiak, Walker Bramblett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
DELLWAYNE PRICE
Defendant:
OFFICER J WILLIAMS, OFFICER C WILLIAMS, OFFICER M WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. MRC #7 LLC
as 1:2021cv03897
Plaintiff:
Detrick King
Defendant:
MRC #7 LLC doing business as MAACO Retail Center and Michael Finch
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chambers v. Benton et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Deputy Warden C. Betterson, Correctional Officer Mitchell, Doctor Agyemang and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Chambers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
