Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Fink v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Chris Fink
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00742
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Fink v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00827
Plaintiff:
Chris Fink
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00944
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Edwards et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2017cv02883
Plaintiff:
Myrlon Edwards , Daniel Fink , Christopher Moore and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClain et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01534
Plaintiff:
Sherangelia McClain , Amber Hedges , Robin Dooley and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fink v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Fink
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2013cv02464
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hunt et al
as 4:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Ted R Hunt, Robin Threlkeld, Robert F. Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
