Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Kuca v. Flagstar Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv10418
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Kuca
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
FLAGSTAR BANK NA v. HARRINGTON et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
FLAGSTAR BANK NA
Defendant:
CARL HARRINGTON and LINDA HARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McIvor v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv10070
Plaintiff:
James McIvor
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv10071
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Scott
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stewart v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv13070
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stewart
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Kozak
as 23-2008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB
Defendant / Appellant:
PEGGY J. KOZAK
Wittenberg v. Flagstar Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wittenberg and Arthur of the Wittenberg Family
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A., James K. Ciroli, Catherine V. Eastwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
FLAGSTAR BANK NA v. GALLUZZO et al
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
FLAGSTAR BANK NA
Defendant:
MAUREEN G GALLUZZO and PETER J GALLUZZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Kozak
as 23-1375
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FLAGSTAR BANK and FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB
Defendant / Appellant:
PEGGY J. KOZAK
Storymaker Enterpises LLC v. Mayes et al
as 3:2021cv01200
Plaintiff:
Storymaker Enterpises LLC
Defendant:
Frank Shane Mayes, M/V ONE MOOR TIME, ABC Insurance Company and others
Claimant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
