Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Gainsburg v. The Florida Bar et al
as 0:2023cv61877
Plaintiff:
Barry Gainsburg
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Florida Supreme Court, Joshua E. Doyle, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rodriguez v. State of Florida et al
as 9:2023cv80855
Plaintiff:
Suzette Grace Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of Florida, Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
VON LOCHAUSEN v. FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
as 3:2021cv04194
Plaintiff:
EDWARD OTTO VON LOCHAUSEN, IV
Defendant:
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VON LOCHAUSEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
as 3:2021cv02575
Plaintiff:
EDWARD OTTO VON LOCHAUSEN, IV
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01714
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. CANADY et al
as 4:2021cv00163
Defendant:
JOSHUA E DOYLE, FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, ALAN LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON B TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America, et al.
as 6:2021cv00616
Respondent:
US District Courts 11th Circuit, US Supreme Court, FDLE and others
Petitioner:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
