Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nagipejutawin v. Director of Floyd Co. Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
Nagipejutawin and Julia Catherine Stanley
Respondent:
Director of Floyd Co. Jail and Floyd Co Sheriff Dave Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nagipejutawin et al v. Director, Floyd Co Jail/Detention
as 4:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Nagipejutawin, Julia Catherine Stanley, Amanda Charles and others
Respondent:
Director, Floyd Co Jail/Detention
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abney v. Floyd Co. Jail
as 4:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mark James Abney
Defendant:
Floyd Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. FLOYD CO JAIL et al
as 4:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
FLOYD CO JAIL, DR. GARCIA and ARCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Floyd Co Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Floyd Co Jail, Co Archer and Nurse Garcia
Plaintiff:
Michael C Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2019cv00188
Defendant:
FLOYD CO. JAIL, ROY WASHINGTON and FRANK LOOP
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ANDREW PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. BUSH
as 4:2019cv00007
Defendant:
FLOYD CO JAIL, NEW ALBANY INDIANA and BUSH
Plaintiff:
HARVEY ALAN GIBSON, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv04905
Defendant:
Counselor Cripp, Renfroe, Dr. Decruise and others
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCAS v. FLOYD CO. JAIL et al
as 4:2016cv00224
Defendant:
DR. D. EICHENBURGER, FLOYD CO. JAIL, SHERIFF FRANK LOOP and others
Plaintiff:
KEETH EUGENE LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Floyd Co. Jail et al
as 4:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
Floyd Co. Jail, Pledger, Nicholas Yarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
