Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00683
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Flynn v. Dunn, et al.
as 1:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flynn
Defendant:
Cynthia Stewart and Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Flynn
as 2:2017mc00126
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Daniel P Flynn
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mathis v. Wilson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
K. Wilson, Mrs. Bush, Mrs. Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Dunn (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00388
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flynn
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kline v. Alpha Cable Solutions LLC
as 7:2014cv02100
Plaintiff:
Flynn Kline
Defendant:
Alpha Cable Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada v. McAuliffe et al
as 1:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Defendant:
Kathy Jane McAuliffe and Donna Jean Flynn
Cross_claimant:
Donna Jean Flynn
Cross_defendant:
Kathy Jane McAuliffe
Counter_claimant:
Donna Jean Flynn
Counter_defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Flynn v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02444
Plaintiff:
Barry Flynn
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
