Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Choi et al
as 0:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce
Defendant:
John Choi, George Soule, David Asp and others
Intervenor:
Clean Elections Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Flynn v. USA
as 0:2022cv01690
Petitioner:
Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Flynn v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01265
Petitioner:
Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flynn v. Warden, FPC Duluth
as 0:2022cv00975
Petitioner:
Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Duluth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Almendinger et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02198
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schrader, Charles Ballard, Jessica Lawson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Gibbs et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02040
Plaintiff:
Richard Beagles, James Smith, Ozzie Jenkins and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Flynn v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Flynn
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
