Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Mahaffey v. Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trontez Mahaffey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington, City of Lexington, Warden David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jideofor v. FMC Lexington Federal Medical Center et al
as 5:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu Jideofor
Defendant:
FMC Lexington, United States and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazer v. Mullins, RN et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
P Mullins, RN, Amanda Miller, Crystal Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Warden at FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Warden at FMC Lexington and C.O. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. FMC Lexington
as 5:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Aarika Lee Wilson
Defendant:
FMC Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frazer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons FMC Lexington
as 5:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons FMC Lexington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Gonzalez v. David Paul
as 23-5294
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALBERT GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID PAUL, Warden, FMC Lexington
Jideofor v. FMC Lexington Federal Medical Center et al
as 0:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu Jideofor
Defendant:
FMC Lexington Federal Medical Center and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nielsen v. FMC Lexington Warden
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ephraim J. Nielsen
Defendant:
FMC Lexington Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. USA
as 5:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Shannon Keith Harris
Respondent:
Warden, FMC Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
