Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Schulz v. Wondra et al
as 5:2023cv03021
Plaintiff:
Trey L. Schulz
Defendant:
William Wondra, Travis Nicholson, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Cahill et al
as 5:2022cv03305
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Cahill, Tonda Hill, Candice Alcaraz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Sedgwick County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03230
Defendant:
(fnu) Heater, (fnu) Moore, (fnu) Hinshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. McGovern et al
as 5:2015cv03241
Plaintiff:
Randall A. Fulbright
Defendant:
Ken McGovern, Charles Branson, (fnu) Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulbright v. McGovern et al
as 5:2015cv03187
Plaintiff:
Randall A. Fulbright
Defendant:
Ken McGovern, Charles Branson, (fnu) Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03085
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, (fnu) Bunting, (fnu) Hagenbuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cosgrove v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2008cv03200
Plaintiff:
Charles Cosgrove
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, (fnu) Bellar, (fnu) Luthe and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walker v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03226
Plaintiff:
Eric Derasse Walker
Defendant:
Duke Terrell, Michael Nalley, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
