Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lee v. McCauley et al
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lee
Defendant:
Lt. C. McCauley, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
David Watson v. Gus Christo, et al
as 19-2737
Defendant / Appellee:
GUS CHRISTO, Chaplain, JAMES SCARBOROUGH, Deputy Warden, MICHAEL KNIGHT, Food Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. WATSON
MOORE v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2013cv06943
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN ANTONIO MOORE
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAIL, DOMANIC CAPANNA and GLOUCESTER COUNTY FOOD SERVICE SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 11-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, Central Office Department of Corrections Religious Accomodations Board for Special Needs, DAVE ROBERTS, Unit Manager, Bureau of Inmate Services Central Office of Department of Corrections, T'SHANA KYLER, Department of Corrections Grievance Final Review Board and others
Alfonso Percy Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 10-4262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, Central Office Department of Corrections Religions Accomodations, DAVE ROBERTS, Unit Manager, Bureau of Inmate Services Central Office of Department of Corrections, T'SHANA KYLER, Department of Corrections Grievance Final Review Board and others
Keith Ellis, et al v. USA, et al
as 09-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ELLIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARVIN HOLLAND, ANTWON ROGERS, SIDDIQ A. HAMID and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES F. SHERMAN, GARY GRIMM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
