Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION et al
as 1:2026cv01855
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant: CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Oregon v. Donald Trump
as 26-1804
Plaintiff: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF OREGON and others
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: ADVANCING AMERICAN FREEDOM, INC., JONATHAN BEAN, PETER T. CALCAGNO and others
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2026cv01502
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Pacific Media Workers Guild et al v. City of Modesto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv01623
Plaintiff: Pacific Media Workers Guild, Angel Jose Flores, Julissa Ruiz Ramirez and others
Defendant: City of Modesto and Brandon Gillespie
Amicus Curiae: Central Valley Journalism Collaborative, First Amendment Coalition, Freedom of the Press Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 1:2026cv01358
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and U.S. NORTHERN COMMAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00247
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
President and Fellows of Harvard College v. US Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 25-2230
Plaintiff: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in the official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Interested Party: AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, HARVARD UNDERGRADUATE PALESTINE SOLIDARITY COMMITTEE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and others
Tincher et al v. Mullin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2025cv04669
Plaintiff: Susan Tincher, John Biestman, Janet Lee and others
Defendant: Todd Lyons, Marcos Charles, David Easterwood and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Minneapolis, Mmoja Ajabu, Former Employees of the Special Litigation Section of the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dennis Donnelly v. Des Moines Register and Tribune Co., et al
as 25-3451
Plaintiff: Dennis Donnelly, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: Des Moines Register and Tribune Company, Inc., J. Ann Selzer, Selzer & Company and others
Amicus Curiae: American Association for Public Opinion Research, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 46 News and Media Organizations
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv04218
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF WAR, PETE HEGSETH and others
Plaintiff: NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and JULIAN E. BARNES
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF NEW YORK, PENTAGON PRESS ASSOCIATION, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?