Cases 1 - 10 of 2,153
Ford et al v. Werrington Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01564
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Ford and Barbara G Ford
Defendant:
Werrington Homeowners Association, Inc., Walter E Spears and Jeffrey B Hardaway
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Richardson v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Leticia Richardson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Boss v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Alexis Boss
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wright v. Richardson et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Defendant:
Deshon Anderson, Cedric Lamar Richardson, Dawn Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leal v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Henry Leal
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., AGC, Inc. f/k/a Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Guirard et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Guirard and Keely R. Guirard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mitchell v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Paul Mitchell
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stump and Robert Ford
Defendant:
MAKANJI & SONS, LLC d/b/a CLASSIC INN, ANKIT JITENDRA Bhakta, HARSHABEN J. BHAKTA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stump et al v. MAKANJI & SONS, LLC
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stump and Robert Ford
Defendant:
MAKANJI & SONS, LLC d/b/a CLASSIC INN MOTEL, ANKIT JITENDRA BHAKTA, HARSHABEN J. BHAKTA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
