Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Julio Pacheco, et al v. New Jersey Department of Treas, et al
as 21-2120
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN J. FICARA, Director, FORD M. SCUDDER, State Treasurer, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO PACHECO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PACHECO INC, doing business as PACHECO'S BAR
PACHECO et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 2:2018cv01615
Plaintiff:
JULIO PACHECO and PACHECO, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, FORD M. SCUDDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 1:2017cv02944
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Arthur B. Laffer, FORD M SCUDDER, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clinton Barlow, III v. Arthur Laffer, et al
as 17-5485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR LAFFER, CEO Laffer Associates, FORD M. SCUDDER, N.J. State Treasury, MIKE R. SMITH and others
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 3:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
Arthur B. Laffer, Ford M. Scudder, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 1:2017cv01939
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Arthur Laffer, FORD M SCUDDER, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 3:2017cv01939
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
Arthur Laffer, FORD M SCUDDER, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barlow v. Laffer et al
as 2:2017cv02208
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
Arthur Laffer, Ford M. Scudder, Mike R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCUDDER v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
as 3:2016cv07433
Plaintiff:
FORD M SCUDDER
Defendant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
