Cases 1 - 10 of 368
Peterson v. Subit et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David W Peterson
Defendant:
Michael C Subit and Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Coenmans v. Bakon Bakkerijmachines USA Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
FRANK COENMANS
Defendant:
LUC IMBREHECHTS and BAKON BAKKERIJ MACHINES, USA INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Fischer v. State of Washington Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv05356
Plaintiff:
Jay Frank Fischer
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv05271
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Nelson, Frank Gilletti, Heather Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodworth v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Frank Woodworth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meyer et al v. Kiesel et al
as 3:2024cv05156
Plaintiff:
S Marie Meyer and Ahren Meyer
Defendant:
Diana Lynn Kiesel, Peter Kram, Robert Helland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ptah v. Berger et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Malek Kalid Ptah
Defendant:
Franke Berger, Brad Bales and Mark B Tackitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
