Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. James
as 23-7352
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK JAMES
Puma Bravo v. McAleenan
as 19-953
Defendant / Appellee:
Mary Beth Keller, Chief immigration Judge Executive Office of Immigrartion Review, Frank James Loprest, Jr., Chief Immigration Judge, New York District, Executive Office of Immigration Review, New York NY, L. Francis Cissna, Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moises Guerrero Ramos, and their 3 USC children, Sherlyn Ivonne Puma Duran, by her mother and Guardian Ana Cecilia Duran Guaman, Nicole Cecilia Puma Duran, by her mother and Guardian, Ana Cecilia Duran Guaman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Oslzly v. United States Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv06473
No Address Provided:
Frank James Oslzly
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Oslzly v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv06332
Plaintiff:
Frank James Oslzly
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oslzly v. Mendelwicz et al
as 1:2015cv05681
Defendant:
Nehemiah Israel Ben-Zev, Jewish Board for Family and Children's Services and Israel Mendelwicz
Plaintiff:
Frank James Oslzly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oslzly et al v. Rosenblatt et al
as 1:2014cv03638
Defendant:
Bowery Residents Committee, INC, Cynthia Dukas, Marilyn Fulton and others
Plaintiff:
Frank James Oslzly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ruffino v. Murphy et al
as 3:2009cv01287
Plaintiff:
Jake J. Ruffino
Defendant:
Scott Murphy, Brett Salafia, Michael Kudish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
