Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Perlman v. General Electric
as 24-514
Plaintiff:
CAROL PERLMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR. and others
Perlman v. General Electric
as 23-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carol Perlman
Defendant / Appellee:
General Electric, GE Healthcare, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr. and others
Perlman v. General Electric et al
as 1:2022cv09823
Plaintiff:
Carol Perlman
Defendant:
General Electric, GE Healthcare, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
JIMENEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07471
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK JIMENEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarroll v. Gill et al
as 3:2020cv00457
Defendant:
Halloran, John D. McCarroll, Charles Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret McCarroll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TROUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36456
Plaintiff:
FRANK JIMENEZ TROUGH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Jimenez, Jr. v. Deutsche Bank Natl Trust Co.
as 13-50403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK JIMENEZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Jimenez, Jr. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 5:2011cv01110
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Frank Jimenez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Jimenez v. Thomas Marine Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv22718
Plaintiff:
Frank Jimenez
Defendant:
Thomas Marine Systems, Inc. and Thomas John, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amity Rubberized Pen Company v. Jacqueline Morovati et al
as 2:2007cv08314
Plaintiff:
Amity Rubberized Pen Company
Defendant:
Jacqueline Morovati, Frank Jimenez and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
