Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Frank Nellom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-3215
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
NELLOM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frank Nellom, et al v. Anne Ambrose, et al
as 23-1388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK NELLOM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TENISHA NELLOM, JADEN NELLOM and JULIAN NELLOM
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, BARBARA A. ASH, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
J. D. N. and J. F. N.
Frank Nellom, et al v. Anne Ambrose, et al
as 22-2962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK NELLOM, J. D. N. and J. F. N.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TENISHA NELLOM, JADEN NELLOM and JULIAN NELLOM
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, BARBARA A. ASH, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Frank Nellom v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 22-2516
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
NELLOM et al v. AMBROSE et al
as 2:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM, TENISHA NELLOM, JADEN NELLOM and others
Defendant:
ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, BARBARA A. ASH, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELLOM v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
JAMES KENNEY, KIMBERLY ALI, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELLOM v. EXELON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
EXELON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER M. CRANE, JOHN SENKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELLOM v. EXELON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
EXELON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER M. CRANE, JOHN SENKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
