Cases 11 - 20 of 287
Boyer v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 5:2023cv02885
Plaintiff:
Andre Boyer and Pennsylvania S.I.T.E.S. Agents, LLC
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia, Lawrence S Krasner, Philadelphia Office of the Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andre Echols, Jr. v. Peter Niznik, et al
as 23-2454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. ECHOLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER NIZNIK, Officer, Star #9182, EDDIE T. JOHNSON, Former CPD Superintendent, ERIK ALBRIGHT, Officer, Star #11522 and others
SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. 11630 CAROLINE ROAD ACQUISITIONS
as 2:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
11630 CAROLINE ROAD ACQUISITIONS and PHILADELPHIA POLICE HOME ASSOCIATION doing business as 7C LOUNGE also known as 7C LOUNGE AT PHILADELPHIA FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE #5
Interested Party:
GREGORY CAMPBELL, RAMBLERS, LLC doing business as THE CRISPIN TAVERN, 7701 WALKER STREET, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Christopher Wieland, et al v. Renata Sherrod, et al
as 23-5642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NICHOLAS WIELAND
Plaintiff:
MARILYN B. WIELAND, (Deceased) and ROBERT C. WIELAND, II, (Deceased)
Defendant / Appellee:
RENATA D. SHERROD, MARK A. SHERROD, AUSTIN SHERROD and others
Phelps v. Saginaw, City of et al
as 1:2023cv11020
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Phelps
Defendant:
Saginaw, City of, Fraternal Order of Police Associates, Ray Janni Lodge, Inc., Vincent Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Givens et al v. Wichita, Kansas, City of et al
as 6:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Wanda Givens, Chester Pinkston and Jose Salcido
Defendant:
Wichita, Kansas, City of, Bryan Frye, Robert Layton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
