Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Thomas v. DeKalb County Georgia
as 1:2023cv05699
Petitioner: FRED LEE THOMAS
Respondent: DeKalb County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. DEKALB COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00489
Petitioner: FRED LEE THOMAS
Respondent: DEKALB COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fred Lee, Jr.In re: Fred Lee, Jr.
as 23-13049
Petitioner: In re: FRED LEE, JR.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Addoh-Kondi et al v. Jefferson County Commission,The et al
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff: Alexia Addoh-Kondi, Cynthia Bonner, Ja'Nelle Brown and others
Defendant: Jefferson County Commission,The, Steve Ammons, T. Joe Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
BUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22720
Plaintiff: FRED LEE BUSSELL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Fred White, III
as 21-14307
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: FRED LEE WHITE, III, a.k.a. Trey White
Fred Bryant v. Warden, et al
as 21-13761
Petitioner / Appellant: FRED LEE BRYANT
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
BUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36861
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: FRED LEE BUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEST v. ROBERSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00568
Defendant: BRODERIC V ROBERSON
Plaintiff: FRED LEE WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL v. BLAIR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00034
Defendant: DEPUTY WARDEN BLAIR, LUTENT HURST, Officer Mosley and others
Plaintiff: FRED LEE DANIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?