Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gibson v. Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05118
Defendant:
Robert Burgess doing business as Burgess Group also known as BOB BURGESS AND ASSOCIATES, Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc., UL VERIFICATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis Leah Freeman Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Freeman v. USA
as 4:2021cv00727
Plaintiff:
Debbie S Freeman
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Freeman v. Ellis
as 5:2019cv05204
Defendant:
Nekeidra Ellis
Plaintiff:
Thomas Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Kroger Co et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Kroger Co
Plaintiff:
Marie Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Higgs v. PNK, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv04079
Plaintiff:
Jared Higgs
Defendant:
PNK, Inc. and Jerry Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00762
Plaintiff:
Brent Freeman
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc , NV Organon , Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Reed v. Owens et al
as 2:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
Elroy Reed
Defendant:
Lawrence Owens, Cheryl Owens, Claude Barnes and others
Movant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Henderson et al v. Globallab Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv05253
Plaintiff:
Melissa Henderson and Dana Jones
Defendant:
Globallab Solutions, Inc. , Concentra Laboratories, LLC and Tyler Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons v. Freeman Transport, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv04101
Plaintiff:
Danny Simmons
Defendant:
Freeman Transport, Inc. and Joseph Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2009cv00413
Plaintiff:
Brian R Freeman
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
