Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Macias et al
as 4:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Avaro Covarrubias Perez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Macias, Correctional Officer L.Lopez, C. Koening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Freeman v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Shelley Freeman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Stanford v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Defendant:
Lt. B. Perez, J. Coleman, B. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Labson-Freeman et al
as 3:2023cv04221
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Beth Labson-Freeman, Edward C. Chen and Katherine N. Siereveld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfson v. Zwillinger et al
as 4:2023cv04346
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
Joseph Zwillinger, Neil Blumenthal, Dick Boyce and others
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara
as 4:2023mc80222
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
