Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff: THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
In re: FieldTurf Artificial Turf Marketing & Sales Practi, et al
as 23-8033
Petitioner: In re: FIELDTURF ARTIFICIAL TURF MARKETING & SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, FIELDTURF USA INC, a Florida Corporation, FIELDTURF INC, a Canadian Corporation and others
Respondent: BOROUGH OF CARTERET, CITY OF FREMONT, COUNTY OF HUDSON and others
Harun El v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2354
Plaintiff / Appellant: HARUN AL-RASHID EL
Defendant / Appellee: TOM WOLF, JIM KENNY, GOEHRING, RUTTER & BOEHM and others
Michael French v. Warden Rockview
as 22-1363
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL JAMES FRENCH
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN ROCKVIEW
Morris Glover v. Daniel Cohen, et al
as 21-1606
Defendant / Appellee: DANIEL E. COHEN, SUZANNE KAMEESE, BRUCE C. JOHNSON and others
Defendant: LOWELL FRENCH
Plaintiff / Appellant: MORRIS S. GLOVER
Jack Allen v. USA, et al
as 17-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOLICITOR GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
In re: Clinton French
as 16-3038
Petitioner: In re: CLINTON FRENCH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Alan French
as 16-2184
Petitioner: In re: ALAN FRENCH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3201
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?