Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Frei v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 6:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Scott Frei and Richard W. Salmon
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Michael Wu, Christine Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Tsham et al
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Capt. Jeff Tsham, Dep. Susan Fleming, Lt. Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frey v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2019cv00694
Plaintiff:
Ilana Frey
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rautio v. Polk County OR et al
as 3:2016cv01943
Defendant:
Sergeant Richard Bittick, District Attorney Aaron Brown, Lemarr Carver and others
Plaintiff:
Bryce Allen Rautio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv01324
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Linda D. Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Thomas et al v. Lincoln County, et al
as 6:2016cv00562
Defendant:
Giovanni Barbers, Page Beutler, Josh Bighill and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Thomas and Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frey v. Martin et al
as 3:2010cv06218
Defendant:
Assistant District Attorney, County Commissioner, Governor and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
