Cases 31 - 34 of 34
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant:
Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant:
Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner:
TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
