Cases 1 - 10 of 26
CLARK v. COWEN et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOUIS CLARK
Defendant:
DOCTOR COWEN and DOCTOR FYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLAND v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FRANKLIN HOLLAND
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, MARK CHARLES, GEORGIA REGENTS UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. FYE, et al
as 5:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L CLARK
Defendant:
CHIQUITA A FYE, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FYE et al
as 5:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
BRAJA SMITH
Defendant:
FYE, SPIKES, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALI et al v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2016cv00421
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MIKEL PALI, MICHAEL DAVIDSON and WILLIAM LEMATTEY
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JONES, EADDIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FRANKLIN HOLLAND
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, ROBINSON, FYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKISSICK v. DEAL et al
as 5:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
RODERICK MCKISSICK
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STONER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , CHIQUITA A FYE , NORMAN HOWARD FITZ-HENLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STONER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIQUITA A FYE, NORMAN HOWARD FITZ-HENLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTT et al v. FYE et al
as 5:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
MACK HENRY LOTT, MIMS MICHAEL MORRIS, SR, LLOYD DARRYL WATKINS and others
Defendant:
CHIQUITA A FYE, HALL, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
