Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Falcones-Conforme v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Jorge Falcones-Conforme
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Owens v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Falcon Owens
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Chalifoux
as 5:2017cv00105
Defendant:
Loye A. Blake, Jr., Adam Barnes, Toni Brown and others
Plaintiff:
National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Falcon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08770
Plaintiff:
Carmen Falcon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falcon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05431
Plaintiff:
Rosario Falcon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Brien et al v. Falcon Gas Line Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jessie O'Brien and Kelly O'Brien
Defendant:
Steve Bissell and Falcon Drilling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falcone v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv26335
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Falcone
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falconer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03809
Plaintiff:
Clorah Falconer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falcon et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02446
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Falcon and Raymond Falcon, Sr.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
