Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Quinn v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Depper v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 4:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Bobby Depper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gamadid et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 4:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ikran Gamadid, Ismail Yussuf Maalim and Ikran Dayib Gamadid
Defendant:
Department of State, Monty Wilkinson, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Martinez et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00240
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Isabel Malia Alatorre-Ashley and Amber J Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Kock v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2016cv00025
Defendant:
McCarthy, United States Department of the Treasury, T.M. Franklin Cownie and others
Plaintiff:
Kock and Jeffrey Allan Kock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
