Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Acevedo v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01537
Plaintiff:
Ramon Acevedo
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Hamilton v. Barnett et al
as 1:2013cv11910
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
Reginald Barnett, John Hojnoski, Michael Borecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisions, et al.
as 1:2013cv00117
Petitioner:
Leroy J Kelly
Respondent:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisions and Copenhaven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dunlap v. Ball et al
as 5:2012cv00606
Plaintiff:
Anttwaine M. Dunlap
Defendant:
K. Ball, Mrs. White and Director, Federal Bureau of Prisions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Montgomery v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 5:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Vernon Montgomery
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions and J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joseph Brent RamSeur v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 5:2012cv01629
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions and L McGrew
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brent RamSeur
Brennan v. Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2012cv21254
Plaintiff:
Nathan D. Brennan
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution , Kenny Atkinson , Bob Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisions
as 4:2011cv04643
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mosby et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv04067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mosby and James Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vale v. Federal Bureau of Prisions
as 1:2010cv04270
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions
Plaintiff:
Jason Vale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
