Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Romero-Carrascal v. Federal Bureau of Prisions
as 1:2017cv23057
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Romero-Carrascal
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00100
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01711
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00348
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv11049
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv10666
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, Ivanoff, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12456
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 1:2016cv12491
Plaintiff:
Marjory F. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions and Medical Center, Devens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vailette III v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv04378
Defendant:
Any named and unnamed concerning Cruel and Unusual punishment violation as well as Medical Indifference, Troy Bradswich, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Vailette III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jules v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 8:2015cv01528
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steven Jules
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions, John Doe, FNU Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
