Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Isaac Jackson v. Federal Correctional Instituti
as 21-3320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC P. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PEKIN, Staff
Porter v. Vereen
as 21-60918
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Porter
Respondent / Appellee:
Walter Vereen, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Yazoo City Medium
Ambriz v. Fed Corr Institution
as 21-11108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hugo Ambriz
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Correctional Institution - Big Spring, FNU LNU-269, Warden, FCI Big Spring, FNU LNU-269, Director and others
Burale v. Nash
as 21-60833
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ahmed Sala Ali Burale
Respondent / Appellee:
Cheron Nash, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Yazoo City Medium
Jeriton Curry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 21-7313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. OLBERDING, SIS Officer, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WILLIAMSBURG and others
Holly Soeby v. Waseca Fed. Corr. Inst.
as 21-3054
Petitioner / Appellant:
Holly Dawn Soeby
Respondent / Appellee:
Waseca Federal Correctional Institution
Joseph Sims v. Hendrix, et al
as 21-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph M. Sims
Defendant / Appellee:
Hendrix, Warden, Forrest City - FCI Medium, G. Rosalaza, A.W., Forrest City - FCI Medium, Champhon, Forrest City - FCI Medium and others
Oscar Lenton, Sr. v. Warden of FCI Edgefield
as 21-7167
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSCAR LENTON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - EDGEFIELD
Sid Willis, Jr. v. Federal Correctional Instituti
as 21-55573
Petitioner / Appellant:
SID EDWARD WILLIS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - FCI VICTORVILLE
Simmermaker v. Trump, et al
as 21-1123
Defendant / Appellee:
CARTER, Warden-FCI Florence, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY R. SIMMERMAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
