Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Boggs v. Federal Reserve Bank
as 1:2024cv10280
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fernandes v. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
as 1:2020cv10270
Plaintiff:
Cynthia S Fernandes
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boggs v. Citizen Bank et al
as 1:2019cv11112
Plaintiff:
Keen L. Boggs and Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank, Citizen Bank and United States Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv12006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ognian v. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston et al
as 1:2010cv11285
Plaintiff:
Robert Jordan Ognian
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Philip H. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston v Lyne, Woodworth and Evarts, LLP
as 1:2009cv10904
Plaintiff:
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Defendant:
Lyne, Woodworth and Evarts, LLP
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
The Salem Glass Company v. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
as 1:2007cv11136
Plaintiff:
The Salem Glass Company
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sovereign Bank v. Forrer et al
as 1:2007cv10866
Plaintiff:
Sovereign Bank and Sovereign Bank
Defendant:
Jane Forrer and Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Riches v. Federal Reserve Bank et al
as 1:2006cv10499
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank, Credit Suisse First Boston and Export Import Bank
Cause Of Action: JS 44 Sec. IV - no matching citation currently in database
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
