Cases
Federal-Mogul Powertrain LLC v. Vitrica S.A. de C.V.
as 2:2023cv12854
Plaintiff: Federal-Mogul Powertrain LLC
Defendant: Vitrica S.A. de C.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tanika Parker, et al v. Tenneco, Inc., et al
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee: TANIKA PARKER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated and ANDREW FARRIER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: TENNECO, INC., DRIV AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Defendant: DOES, 1-30, John and Jane Doe Defendants
Parker et al v. Tenneco Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10816
Plaintiff: Tanika Parker and Andrew Farrier
Defendant: Tenneco Inc., Driv Automotive Inc, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lon Moncrief, III v. Federal-Mogul Powertrain LLC
as 22-11550
Plaintiff / Appellant: LON MONCRIEF, III
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL-MOGUL POWERTRAIN LLC
Type: Labor Labor - FMLA
Moncrief v. Tenneco Inc
as 5:2020cv01215
Plaintiff: Lon Moncrief, III
Defendant: Tenneco Inc doing business as Federal-Mogul Powertrain and Federal-Mogul Powertrain LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Welch v. Federal Mogul Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00487
Plaintiff: Brian Welch
Defendant: Federal Mogul Corporation , Federal Mogul Powertrain, LLC and Terry Offerle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?