Cases 1 - 10 of 22
RIVAS ALVAREZ v. KEOUGHAN et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rafael Antonio Rivas Alvarez
Defendant:
Wendell Keoughan and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MUSICK et al v. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02297
Plaintiff:
LEE MUSICK and JOHN NORTON
Defendant:
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC., FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and JEFFERY CADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thrush Co., Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Thrush Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
FedEx Freight, Inc. v. Evennon, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
FedEx Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Evennon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Hypolite v. FedEx Freight Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Shamecka Hypolite
Defendant:
Shamar Hypolite, FedEx Freight, Inc. and Christopher Jahnz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ramos Perez et al v. Gorres et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ramos Perez and Ignacio Hernandez Morales
Defendant:
Randall A Gorres and Fedex Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
McDonough et al v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Robert McDonough and Joy McDonough
Defendant:
Alex Dowell and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
