Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Anderson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Victor Anderson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Robert Richeson, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cerilli v. Bysiewicz et al
as 3:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Susan Bysiewicz, Ned Lamont, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee et al
as 3:2020cv01119
Defendant:
Tawana Furtique, Lightner, Mazzocca and others
Plaintiff:
David Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Gallagher et al
as 3:2015cv01574
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Day
Defendant:
Colleen Gallagher, Fedus, Nikki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siminausky v. Starkowski et al
as 3:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Andrew Siminausky
Defendant:
Jane Starkowski, Connecticut Managed Health Care Providers, Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Pierre v. Semple et al
as 3:2014cv01866
Plaintiff:
Jon A. St. Pierre
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Scott Erfe, Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montaz v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv08945
Plaintiff:
Manuel Fedus Montaz
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baccash v. Bombard et al
as 3:2014cv01044
Plaintiff:
Edward Baccash
Defendant:
Tim Bombard, Fedus, Susan Glasman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRECKER et al v 1ST REPUBLIC MORTGAGE BANKERS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv05646
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRECKER , LAURA BRECKER , ROBERT ASHBY and others
Defendant:
1ST REPUBLIC MORTGAGE BANKERS, INC., ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC., AMC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
