Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lose v. Bacorn et al
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Robert W Lose, Jr
Defendant:
Felicia Bacorn, Department of Human Health and Resources, Jennifer Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lose, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert William Lose, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Stephens, West Virginia Deparment of Human Health and Resources, Guardian ad litem Kristen Antolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClung et al v. ECP Incorporated et al
as 3:2018cv01453
Defendant:
A-One Dealer Supply, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frank McClung and Felicia McClung
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ECP Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant:
FOGIT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11773
Plaintiff:
Felicia J. Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09842
Plaintiff:
Felicia Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windham et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09476
Plaintiff:
Felicia Windham and Dana Windham
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tolley et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv03171
Plaintiff:
Felicia Tolley and Dennis Tolley
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eggleston v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02162
Plaintiff:
Felicia Eggleston
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
