Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Godbold v. Field et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Marshall Godbold
Defendant:
Newell B. Field and Patrick McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01034
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fields v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Fields
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Emrit v. Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office
as 1:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Fields
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Riley v. Warden et al
as 9:2021cv00062
Respondent:
Secretary, Warden, Field Office Director and others
Petitioner:
Fontaine Lavot Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKoy v. Fields
as 9:2020cv00427
Petitioner:
Orraine McKoy
Respondent:
Leroy Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odisho v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00333
Plaintiff:
Sami Odisho
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. and Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. doing business as Field and Stream
Not Classified By Court:
Justice William E. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Harden v. Fields
as 9:2018cv00162
Petitioner:
Anthony C. Harden
Respondent:
Leroy Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Utica Police Department et al
as 6:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Kelvin C. Brown
Defendant:
Utica Police Department, Mark Fields and Paul Paladino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
