Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Martin et al v. Black et al
as 4:2023cv03564
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Martin, John E. Sickle, Jr., John R. Sindyla and others
Defendant:
Steven D. Black, Mark A. Chancy, Celeste A. Clark and others
Interested Party:
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado
Intervenor:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund, Jose F. Isais, Timothy Himstreet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Fire & Police Pension Associat, et al v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 20-15898
Defendant / Appellee:
MACKEY J. MCDONALD, CYNTHIA H. MILLIGAN, JOHN D. BAKER II and others
Appellant:
EDWARD W. COCHRAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF SYSTEM and FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Fire & Police Pension Associat, et al v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 20-15879
Defendant / Appellee:
MACKEY J. MCDONALD, CYNTHIA H. MILLIGAN, JOHN D. BAKER II and others
Appellant:
CATHY LEBENDIG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF SYSTEM and FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Fire & Police Pension Associat v. Bank of Montreal
as 19-976
Defendant / Appellee:
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, The Bank of Nova Scotia, BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
George Hannon, et al v. American Express Company, et al
as 18-16115
:
In re: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE J. HANNON
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO and THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
Feuer v. Baker, et al.
as 4:2018cv02866
Defendant:
Fredrico F. Pena, Suzanne M. Vautrinot, John R. Shrewsberry and others
Plaintiff:
R.A. Feuer
Interested Party:
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado and The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado v. Bank of Montreal et al
as 1:2018cv00342
Defendant:
HSBC Bank Canada, RBC Dominion Securities Inc., National Bank Financial Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado v. Stumpf et al
as 3:2016cv06631
Plaintiff:
Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado
Defendant:
John G. Stumpf, Timothy J. Sloan, Carrie L. Tolstedt and others
Movant:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Pappas, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al
as 14-55518
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, BARRY BRAHN and others
Objector - Appellant:
THE BANK OF AMERICA 401(K) PLAN FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, as a Successor to the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., ANGELO R. MOZILO, ERIC P. SIERACKI and others
George Pappas, et al v. The BOA 401(k) Plan for Legacy
as 11-55570
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, BARRY BRAHN and others
Objector - Appellant:
THE BANK OF AMERICA 401(K) PLAN FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, as a Successor to the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., ANGELO R. MOZILO, ERIC P. SIERACKI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
