Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00271
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv06601
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv04910
Plaintiff: BILL WILLIAMS
Defendant: CITY OF ALLENTOWN , KEITH MORRIS , ED PAWLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Nathan Diggs v. Board of Corrections, et al
as 13-35017
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHAN DANIEL DIGGS
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY, CAROLING MELINIE and others
Thomas Baccus, Jr. v. Board of Corrections, et al
as 12-35394
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS BACCUS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY, CAROLING MELINIE and others
Nathan Diggs v. Board of Corrections, et al
as 11-36076
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHAN DANIEL DIGGS
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY, CAROLING MELINIE and others
Diggs v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff: Nathan Daniel Diggs
Defendant: Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff: Thomas Baccus, Jr
Defendant: Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeson v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00352
Plaintiff: Milo Beeson
Defendant: Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00401
Plaintiff: Donald Day, Richard Kelly, Milo Beeson and others
Defendant: Board of Corrections, Johanna Smith, Kathy Nieko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?