Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Anderson v. Florida Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01373
Defendant:
Florida Dept. of Corrections, Florida State Prison and Officer Neagu
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUDDICK v. FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2020cv00426
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE R RUDDICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. State of Florida Dept. of Corrections
as 0:2020cv61730
Defendant:
State of Florida Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Timmesha Lashae Gaines Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. Secretary, Florida Dept. of Corrections
as 8:2020mc00017
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Donte Jermaine Hall
Robinson v. Jpay.com L.L.C. et al
as 2:2019cv14402
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Robinson
Defendant:
Jpay.com L.L.C. and Florida Dept. of Corrections Secretary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2019cv23871
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah-Aladin-Yussuf-JBN-Ayvub
Defendant:
Moore, Assistant Director, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHOICE v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2019cv00435
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE PRISON and MIKEAL RATHMAN
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and HENRY JAMES CHOICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00339
Defendant:
DANYELES, C BROWN, MARK INCH and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2019cv00673
Respondent:
Florida Dept of Corrections, Secretary Mark Inch, State Of Florida and 7th Judicial Circuit, in and for Putnam County, Florida
Petitioner:
Jeffrey R. Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
