Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Neidl v. Top Rank, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2015cv00849
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Floyd Mayweather, Jr., Mayweather Promotions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Hoevener and Robert Neidl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Assalian v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00855
Plaintiff:
John Assalian
Defendant:
Mayweather Promotions, LLC, Floyd Mayweather, Jr., Emmanuel D Pacquiao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NOT USED
as 2:2015cv00854
Defendant:
John Assalian, Mayweather Promotions, LLC, Floyd Mayweather, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Picozzi v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2015cv00816
Defendant:
5th Floor Sgts CCDC, 7th Floor Sgts., Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voss v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00183
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Steven Floyd Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. Parole and Probation Et. Al et al
as 2:2014cv01882
Plaintiff:
Shanna Floyd
Defendant:
Parole and Probation Et. Al, A. Watford and R. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Floyd Voss v. Isidaro Baca et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Greg Cox, William Humphrey and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Floyd Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emelo v. Lexus Financial Services
as 2:2014ms00006
Claimant:
Jonathan Floyd Emelo
Respondent:
Lexus Financial Services
China Energy Corporation v. Alan T.Hill et al
as 3:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
China Energy Corporation
Defendant:
Randy Dock Floyd, Jun He, Alan T. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mayweather v. Wine Bistro, LLC
as 2:2013cv00210
Defendant:
2nd To None Entertainment, LLC, Lee Bates, Ronald Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Mayweather
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
