Cases 1 - 10 of 33
BULGER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04805
Plaintiff:
DANNY BULGER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., SHANE CUFFREY, LPN and PAMELA FOLEY, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULGER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2022cv04805
Plaintiff:
DANNY BULGER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., SHANE CUFFREY, LPN and PAMELA FOLEY, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. WOELPPER et al
as 2:2020cv05103
Respondent:
ADA KOLLEEN MCMULLEN, TRANSIT P/O ROONEY, TRANSIT P/O CAMBURN and others
Petitioner:
RESHAN SAVAGE BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kern v. Ramos et al
as 3:2020cv00053
Defendant:
L.P.N. Christine Feyjoo, D.O. Kenneth Wloczewski, Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Kern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
SC/O POWELL, SC/O MANDERA, SC/O ACEBO and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOODS, THADDEUS THOMAS and MATTHEW SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELDS v. COSTIERA et al
as 2:2019cv21346
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTIERA, S C/O I. MATOS, MAJOR FOLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MATHEW SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2019cv03816
Defendant:
HANUSCHAK, JANE DOE 1, HANS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. LEDERER et al
as 2:2019cv01114
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DELANEY, LEDERER and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAN-I: SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. WOELPPER et al
as 2:2019cv01078
Respondent:
JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO, ROONEY, JAREK KRAJEWSKI and others
Petitioner:
RASHAN-I SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REED v. DELAVIZ
as 2:2018cv01486
Plaintiff:
DANNY REED
Defendant:
JORDAN FOLEY ET, AL. and DAVOUN DELAVIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
