Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Foote v. Hamilton
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Patrick Foote
Defendant:
William Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Davis v. Ansari, et al
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL HOLT
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Foote v. Williams
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Foote, Jr
Defendant:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Takeno et al v. Foote et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Kevin Takeno and Rachell Takeno
Defendant:
C. Sean Foote and Sean Foote Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re: Davis
as 22-6006
Petitioner:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Respondent:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Hart v. Foot Locker Corporation
as 2:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Foot Locker Corporation, Dick Johnson, Rick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amboh v. Duchesne County et al
as 2:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
Tara Jeanne Amboh
Defendant:
Duchesne County, Stephen Foote and Eighth District Court, Duchesne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
as 5:2021cv04039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holt
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
