Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Lacey v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2024cv05327
Plaintiff:
Aja Deion Lacey
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Western State Hospital and Fort Steilacoom Restoration Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Fort Belknap Tribe et al
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Kolton Bishop
Respondent:
Fort Belknap Tribe and Two Rivers Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lane v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Raven Lane
Respondent:
Richard Cantrell and Fort Peck Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Sierra Jackson
Respondent:
Richard Cantrell and Fort Peck Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Christopher v. CDCR Secretary et al
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Victoria Christopher
Defendant:
CDCR Secretary, Cisneros, Heredia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forte v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Forte
Defendant:
Supt III Hernandez, PO III Schwanki, Supt I Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Forte v. Jones
as 3:2021cv00184
Petitioner:
Michael Forte
Respondent:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Teton v. Teton et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Gerrit Teton, U.S. Government, Fort Hall Indian Reservation and others
Plaintiff:
Rydon Clyde Teton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xavier Fort v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2019cv01223
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Petitioner:
Xavier Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
